Talk:Single-layer materials

Physics High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

What's with all the "http://www.kurzweilai.net/" links? Can we link to SERIOUS scientific journals websites and not pseudo-scientific sites? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.69.173.135 (talk) 07:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revamping Boron nitride and molybdenum sulfide subsections and adding a new "borocarbonitride" section[edit]

Hi. Would it be ok for me to revamp the boron nitride and molybdenum sulfide subsections? While there are articles about hexagonal boron nitride and molybdenum sulfide as a whole, those articles and the sections in this article do not have much information concerning the 2D structure and properties.

In addition, I'd like to add a section on borocarbonitride, which is considered to be a new 2D material of its own, as it is not quite graphene and not quite boron nitride.

Thank you. Xekutorp (talk) 01:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free, be bold, none of Wikipedia's pages about 2D materials, graphene, van der waals heterotructures, etc, are particularly complete or well written, all need lots of improvents. --Yikkayaya (talk) 16:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 January 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:50, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Two-dimensional materials → Two-dimensional material – WP:SINGULAR standard for article names Prisencolin (talk) 22:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I was thinking, can it be considered an exception of WP:SINGULAR as per WP:PLURAL "Articles that actually distinguish among multiple distinct instances of related items can be sensibly given a plural title when the alternative would be to create an inappropriately large number of short articles, one on each instance"? Less Unless (talk) 10:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose move, agree with comment: the article title can be plural because the article lists several distinct things. CyreJ (talk) 16:08, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose move. I also agree with comment. Blue.painting (talk) 23:28, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.