Talk:Skip (audio playback)

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 september 2005. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message[edit]

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 07:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus^(talk) 20:28, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Skip (in record player) → Skip (in CD player) — article almost entirely refers to CD sense and only once mentions record sense —Rapido 14:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Oppose expand the article instead. 132.205.99.122 20:03, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and suggest Skip (audio) or Skip (audio recording) to allow the article title to encompass both. Otto4711 21:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Added gramophone info to article and support move to Skip (audio recording) as suggested by User:Otto4711. — AjaxSmack 00:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Skip (audio) makes more sense. Crazysuit 00:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. However skip (audio playback) would be my preferred target. Skip (audio) could mean something like the gap in the Watergate tapes. So skip (audio playback) is less ambiguous. Clearly skip (audio recording) is a poor choice since the skipping occurs on playback and not in the recording process. My second choice would be Skip (audio) if we need to go there for consensus. Vegaswikian 19:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.