Talk:Skyquake

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lakes[edit]

I don't think Seneca and Cayuga are "two of the world's larger and deepest lakes"... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.18.41.97 (talk) 11:40, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weather[edit]

I added the ongoing weather tag due to this currently happening at random throughout the world. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TopsailHS (talk • contribs) 22:53:20, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

And I removed it, because it is not an appropriate usage. The template is intended for a single event that is ongoing, not a recurring event like this. It would be just as inappropriate on thunderstorm for example. Dhaluza 23:36, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Regarding the only reference, (Appletons' Annual Cyclopaedia and Register of Important Events. 1899. p. 440), there is no reference to any mistpouffer. I would like to delete this reference. Sarah.pingrey 23:27, 17 July 2010.

Just to mention, a Google Books search finds many references to mistpouffers - this is a different spelling - should it be substituted? 71.23.209.131 (talk) 05:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"The term originating in Seneca, Georgia, USA during the country's civil war..." has no reference. I believe that the term originated in James Fennimore Cooper's "Lake Gun". What is "(Johnson 5)" doing there? I would like to delete much of this paragraph and move some information up to the main paragraph. Sarah.pingrey 23:32, 17 July 2010.

Skyquakes[edit]

Are mistpouffers related to skyquakes? It has surprised me to not find anything about skyquakes in Wikipedia. --uKER (talk) 21:40, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How do you explain the car alarms and barking when you are next to a lake, not to mention in the middle of the desert! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobby allan (talk • contribs) 15:27, 26 July 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Skyquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:34, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notes and Queries[edit]

This may count as OR - but in the above publication, 5th series vol 6, 11 November 1876 p 389 and vol 7, February 3 1877, p 94 there are articles on these sounds, with reference to recent notes by Mr Knox Wigat. Jackiespeel (talk) 16:28, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Linkspam[edit]

I removed all of this stuff from the External Links section. Being so tangential to the subject of matter, I'd say if anything, they should be used as sources. I'm leaving them here in case there's anything of value to be taken from them.

--uKER (talk) 16:02, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hypotheses[edit]

Should we clean up this section? I feel like there should be a distinction between legitimate hypotheses of the scientific community and "it's probably Dragons or UFOs". --RRorg (talk) 09:56, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have cleaned up this section to reflect more current ideas and include scientific references. Idoubtit00 (talk) 19:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Local names[edit]

should be removed if there isn't a source. I have verified (the easy way: google search + Ngram viewer) that there are no occurrences of "cielmoto" in Spanish or "bombe(s) de mer" and "canon de mer" in French, except for things that are entirely unrelated or direct quotes of this page.

The "verification needed" warning is insufficient, and this page is a source of misinformation, as demonstrated by this widely-viewed video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWXESGggpLY — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.173.62.130 (talk) 15:39, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aerosol Bio Ordinance[edit]

Could it be aerosol cannisters of bio weapons? 

Not of our own , but from a likely adversary? 184.156.42.242 (talk) 17:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
no 2601:85:C101:C9D0:7D36:1536:6507:1B4B (talk) 23:55, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Skyquake&oldid=1198493133"