Talk:Slammiversary

Article?

I've been watching the PPV, and it's on its last match of the night...when will an article on this ppv be up? I noticed it was deleted most likely because there wasn't enough sources or the sources aren't reliable enough Ageshead13 (talk) 02:31, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Question

is this like wrestlemaina for TNA? Y2J RKO 20:25, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

No. It's more of a Royal Rumble type PPV, as there's one type of match that takes place each event (King of the Mountain - the difference is that a RR has 30 wrestlers; KOTM has 5. Winner of RR get's title shot; winner of KOTM wins/retains title). Bound for Glory is TNA's WrestleMania (Lockdown is probably TNA's Suvivor Series). MITB LS 23:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Requested moves

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Move Duja► 10:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

---

• Talk:TNA Slammiversary -- A little over a week ago, a discussion was held whether to move the Bound for Glory pages by adding the "TNA"-prefix in. The move went through. Since, a user has done so for these pages, citing the discussion from BFG. I oppose of this move, as I think that it should be a result of a disambig issue to add the prefix. There are no other pages with the term "Slammiversary". Therefore, I think the pages should be moved back to the old (without the prefix).--MITB LS 02:00, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
  • TNA Slammiversary → Slammiversary
  • TNA Slammiversary (2005) → Slammiversary (2005)
  • TNA Slammiversary (2006) → Slammiversary (2006)
  • TNA Slammiversary (2007) → Slammiversary (2007)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

• Support - as nominator. MITB LS 02:00, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose - I'm not agree, since there was a criteria of naming a professional wrestling PPV or TV show with the promotions initials as a prefix. Somebody would say: why WrestleMania, SummerSlam, Survivor Series and Royal Rumble hasn't the prefix? I saw in the Bound for Glory discussion that there was a sort of agreement about not putting the prefix in the WWE Big Four PPV's, but I think that should be revised. Also, I think that the prefix would provide a better identification of a PPV/TV show. Xbox6 02:17, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
  • The actual reason of the discussion was because of disambig issues. The BFG articles were moved because there are already pages with the term "Bound For Glory". Therefore, the articles were added the prefixes in cordination with that. The WWE Big 4's don't have the initials because there's no disambig issues for them. AND, there's no disambig issues for the term "Slammiversary". MITB LS 02:39, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support - per MITB--ProtoWolf 02:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support - per MITB And ProtoWolf. Mshake3 03:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support - per above. The Hybrid 09:17, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support - per above.  Kip Smithers  00:03, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Chronology of Slammiversary

66.192.63.2 (talk) 12:35, 28 June 2013 (UTC) TNA has never acknowledged that the supposed one hour "Slammiversary" specials (during the company's weekly ppv series) were ever part of the actual of the Slammiversary chronology but yet it's listed here as if it is. I believe this is incorrect and if the company itself (who produced the ppv) doesn't recognize these 1 hour specials, it should not be listed as part of the chronology of the ppv. TNA has posted on their website numerous times that the first Slammiversary PPV took place in 2005, which is listed as the third Slammiversary ppv event in another Wikipedia article.

The fact that no one on Wikipedia has been able or willing to supply event results from those two events (as have been done with all Slammiversary ppv events) which may go to further that these two special events were never really part of the pay-per-view chronology of Slammiversary. All of the Slammiversary articles need an overhaul with the correct listing of the pay-per-view series and supply the year the ppv is celebrating.

For example the article for Slammiversary 2005 could state: "...this was the first annual Slammiversary pay-per-view celebrating the third anniversary of the company". That is a more accurate statement that saying "this is the third event under the Slammiversary chronology".

And yet, while they haven't always been consistent with the practice, the Slammiversary events that included numbers in their titles clearly included the first two anniversary shows, the second of which was the first to use the Slammiversary name. And it's not like they were not PPV events; at the time, before Impact premiered on cable TV, all TNA events were weekly PPVs, so that includes the first anniversary show and the first show to use the Slammiversary name. That the numbers in the chart in the article do not match the numbers that are part of the event name for the editions that are numbered is an error that will be fixed. oknazevad (talk) 00:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC)