Talk:Slavic carnival

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name[edit]

The article was created under Bulgarian name. Since this tradition is present in various Slavic countries, which use different names, we have to consider whether it is most appropriate. Google Books search for "Sirni zagovezni"+tradition gives 36 hits. Slovak+Fašiangy tradition, 48. Polish Ostatki+tradition, well over 300. Czech Masopust+tradition, over 3000. The current name is the worst possible choice. To avoid fighting between 'my national name is better than your national name', I suggest renaming this to Slavic carnival, since it seems to refer to Slavic celebrations related to pre-Easter carnival. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 17:37, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

Is Slavic version distinct enough to merit not being merged to Carnival? I think not. Individual variations can have articles by nation, but I think this one is not really notable. Something to consider in the future. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 17:49, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Slavic carnival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]