Talk:Snooker world rankings 1988/1989

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image copyright problem with Image:Jimmy White snookerplayer.jpg[edit]

Resolved
 – Fair use rationale for image now provided at image page.

The image Image:Jimmy White snookerplayer.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Snooker world rankings 2019/2020 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:20, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 03:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed: Bikini Porn
  • Comment: Any alternative hook suggestions or suggestions for better phrasing are welcome. I considered putting an ALT1 around Thorburn's penalty and the reason for it, but I wasn't sure if that would be regarded as unduly negative about a living person.

5x expanded by BennyOnTheLoose (talk). Self-nominated at 12:10, 4 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • I would suggest that a new hook be proposed as the current one has a very limited audience (i.e. it's probably not going to interest those who aren't snooker fans). Perhaps Lee Vilenski can help suggest something more suitable? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:33, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • BennyOnTheLoose - maybe a good hook would be the reason why Higgins lost his place. Wasn't it due to his ban from headbutting Paul Hatherell? If I'm right that would make a good hook IMO. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:17, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for your consideration Narutolovehinata5 and Lee Vilenski. I think I originally overestimated the appeal of this article to the public at large and it's probably best to quietly withdraw the DYK nomination. LV is right (as ever!) about the cause for the ban but as that happened in 1986 the link feels a little bit too tenuous to me. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]