Talk:Snow White: The Fairest of Them All

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSnow White: The Fairest of Them All has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 27, 2013Good article nomineeListed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Snow White: The Fairest of Them All/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    From the "Development" section: "Kreuk noted that she had been 'entranced', believing that the main message that audiences would take away from the film was that you can't judge an individual's personality based upon their physical appearances." I don't think your allowed to use the word "you" on Wikipedia articles, unless if it is in a quote from a person.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Suggestion: I think some box office info on the European release of the film could be helpful (if there were any), and info about the ratings when the film aired on TV could be helpful (if there were any).
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    The image use here is appropriate, but (this may sound a little picky) I think that the caption for the images of actresses Miranda Richardson and Kristin Kreuk should have it's caption include the full names of the actresses and what "two main characters" the caption is talking about.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I'll give this article seven days to make these improvements, but please let me know if I could be wrong with these issues that should "not be part of a good article".

Reviewer: EditorE (talk · contribs) 23:09, 26 April 2013 (UTC) It appears the issues explained above have been fixed and yet this article is ready for passing. EditorE (talk) 19:43, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 December 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) Fuortu (talk) 20:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Snow White (2001 film)Snow White: The Fairest of Them All – From article and references target is WP:COMMONNAME for this topic. Also that title is a natural disambiguation for this topic. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:23, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Of course – it appears this film has never been called just Snow White is generally not referred to as just Snow White. --IJBall (contribstalk) 20:08, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, this movie is also known as "Snow White". Alec Worley Empires of the Imagination: A Critical Survey of Fantasy Cinema 2005 0786423242 "Similarly the TV movie Snow White (2001), directed by Burton's writing partner Caroline Thompson, frolics in an ... while trying to make sense of the exaggerated behavior of Kristen Kruek's Snow White and Miranda Richardson's evil queen." In ictu oculi (talk) 20:18, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • That's one source. Even if we acknowledge the film has been referred to by both titles, none of that gets to the WP:NATURALDIS argument made by the move proposal. When you look at everything on balance, the proposed move is the correct course of action on both WP:COMMONNAME and WP:NATURALDIS grounds. As long as Snow White (2001 film) continues to exist as a redirect, there is no issue here, and the article should be moved as proposed. --IJBall (contribstalk) 17:45, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. As proposer. It looks like it was originally called just Snow White but it appears that name was changed and it is currently being sold as a DVD Amazon as "Snow White: The Fairest of Them All", IMDb lists it that way, it is referred to in the article in every location the title is shown that way. The cover art shows "Snow White: The Fairest of Them All". I think it is fairly obvious that "Snow White: The Fairest of Them All" is the most common name used to refer to this topic which also has the benefit of being a natural disambiguation for the topic. A basic search for "Snow White (2001)" generally gets "Snow White: The Fairest of Them All (2001)" although some hits for "Snow White (2001)" are also returned. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 21:03, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.