Talk:Soak City (Valleyfair)

Amusement Parks: Cedar Fair Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Cedar Fair Entertainment Company task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge with Valleyfair! page[edit]

I agree with the talk page for Valleyfair, White Water Country Waterpark should be merged with Valleyfair because it is so interwooven. (69.180.150.64 (talk) 21:07, 14 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I disagree. Aside from the fact they share common property, the waterpark is regarded as it's own park by Valleyfair. I am a former employee of Valleyfair, and the separation is reflected in all respects, from operations to marketing. They have their own employees, their own season schedule, their own management, etc. Everything from TV spots to park maps segregate park rides from waterpark attractions. The two parks are separate internally, and I think it should remain that way externally. A simple link to the White Water Country Waterpark (now Soak City) article is sufficient. Merging the two articles is unnecessary and should not happen. Ps60k (talk) 23:53, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]