Talk:Solange discography

This article is within the scope of the Discographies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's collection of discography articles and lists. If you would like to participate please visit the project page. Any questions pertaining to discography-related articles should be directed to the project's talk page.DiscographiesWikipedia:WikiProject DiscographiesTemplate:WikiProject DiscographiesDiscography articles

R&B and Soul Music List‑class Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
List	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why a separate page? - merge tag[edit]

Surely this can fit in the main Solange article. It's nothing but two albums in a table. - eo (talk) 20:05, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Content dispute[edit]

There is an ongoing, disruptive content dispute between User:Dt128 and User:Lovejonesfly. I have reverted to the most recent undisputed version, which may be considered wrong by both editors and have locked the article for 1 week to prevent further disruption. Please take that time to discuss the issue and reach a consensus. Papa November (talk) 11:18, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care about the page, so I am removing my name. Lovejonesfly (talk) 22:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The saddest thing is that neither party really has it right: the reference for each figure should be next to each figure. This practice of ganging up thirty references next to a column header may look prettier, but it makes verification a bitch and makes it much easier for vandalism to go unnoticed. The version with the source per chart is better, but still not right.—Kww(talk) 22:32, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, the saddest thing is that your still talking about it when the discussion has already closed. Also please refrain from using profanty. Discuss the matter like an adult, not an sassy teenager. Lovejonesfly (talk) 00:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that the issue has you a bit upset Lovejonesfly, but you really need to stop jumping on everyone who comments about the article. Even if you've decided you no longer want to work on this particular article, Kww's comments will be helpful for anyone else who wants to make some improvements. Shell ^babelfish 00:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not jumping on everyone Shell Kinney. I'm stating profanity doesn't have to be used, especially with something that has already been discussed. Lovejonesfly (talk) 03:06, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point me at this discussion?—Kww(talk) 03:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussed in the category named after me, were I told them I don't care[1] and then on Dt128's talk page were is quick to complain about the changes.[2] and [3]. I also archived it to be saved for later as proof.[4] Lovejonesfly (talk) 03:17, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I can see that no one actually managed to discuss the changes ... you all got sidetracked by the discussion of edit-warring and who had the right to do what. I'll reiterate my previous stance: references belong immediately next to the figures: not the column headers, and not the table headers. The purpose of references is to make individual figures easy to verify.—Kww(talk) 03:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it was discussed in the links above. But in another conversation, they keep sending messages about the page, and told "enough". I don't care what they do the page. Now, if I cared about the page like I did two months ago, then I would open suggestions on what to do. Lovejonesfly (talk) 14:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note, the references do go in the charts columns, as you will see on any featured list discography. Dt128 15:39, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Solange Knowles discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130823142617/http://www.billboard.com:80/charts/2003-06-28/r-b-hip-hop-albums to http://www.billboard.com/charts/2003-06-28/r-b-hip-hop-albums

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

album from 2016 has sold more than 46,000[edit]

im not a fan actually i don't like her music

but to be fair

her album sold more than just 46,000 like here suggested

it sold 46,000 in the first week — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.247.244.115 (talk) 18:15, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]