Talk:Solar Physics (journal)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 24 September 2014[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Number 57 11:57, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Solar Physics (journal)Solar Physics – letter case suffices for disambiguation – Fgnievinski (talk) 04:42, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:36, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 27 June 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 02:00, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Solar Physics (journal)Solar Physics – capitalization already offers enough distinction from solar physicsfgnievinski (talk) 00:46, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Fgnievinski and Randy Kryn: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:11, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Would respectfully disagree, the capitalized form should go to the Solar physics page, an easy search mistake which isn't actually that much of a mistake. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:05, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per the other Randy K. :-)
  • Oppose and why was it attempted as a technical request with previous RM? In ictu oculi (talk) 14:27, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per the above. BD2412 T 00:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per others, just Solar Physics would not be clear enough. SunDawn (talk) 12:28, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.