Talk:Solving History with Olly Steeds

This page was proposed for deletion by TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) on 18 May 2022.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Solving History with Olly Steeds article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tone[edit]

The article currently reads somewhat like a press release promoting the series. Parts of it at least seem to derive from the Discovery Channel web site, thankfully with some of the more ludicrous hype toned down. Refering to Steeds as Olly is overly familiar. References to his mission, quest etc. are not appropriate. "Olly uncovers exciting new evidence" - is it really new and its excitingness is POV - "that could lead once and for all to the discovery of the Amber Room" - maybe could have done but it didn't. Mutt Lunker (talk) 09:51, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think {{peacock}} is more fitting? serioushat 06:31, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that fits. Mutt Lunker (talk) 07:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]