Talk:Soul Bossa Nova

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Soul Bossa Nova article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Category issues[edit]

The instrumental served as the theme song for a Canadian television show, Definition, which was worthy enough of its own reference. Clearly, the show served as the reference for the song, 'My Definition of a Boombastic Jazz Style', by Canadian hip-hop group Dream Warriors. Perhaps the song also served as inspiration to (also Canadian) Mike Myers when he added it to the Austin Powers movie. Person removing reference did not justify removal of reference. So, I have restored the category reference to Definition. Dogru144, 01:10 12 July 2006 (UTC)

There is no need to specifiy that Mike Myers is Canadian. It does not read properly and is completely irrelevant. Why not say Mike Myers, whose favourite colour is blue? Why not say American rapper, Ludacris? TheIrateTurk 20:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The reference to Mike Meyers' nationality is because the article is listing various Canadian cultural references. Powers ^T 18:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter. This article reads like an advertisement for Canada. "Hey, look, this is Canadian, and so is this, isn't Canada awesome?" is the distinct feeling I get from it. I'm pulling out superfluous uses of "Canadian."Icydesign (talk) 04:12, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Recent Improvements[edit]

This hadn't been updated for almost two months. It was missing an infobox, and there was still some links to add. But I've managed to improve on it; it looks much better now in my opinion. -- MISTER ALCOHOL ^T ^C 17:08, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]