Talk:Southwest Gas

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles

Safety and efficiency?[edit]

Earlier, I reverted some pretty startling unsourced claims about Southwest Gas Corporation (SGC), and those claims were put into the "Safety and Efficiency" section. I did this because they were serious accusations of deliberate violations of safety procedures, and I felt that such claims needed to be sourced, in a manner similar to the Wikipedia policy on biographies of living people. However, reading it now, it seems like that section doesn't do much other than highlight what a good job SGC is doing in being safe and efficient. While I still think that the unsourced claims should be kept out until sources are found to support them, I do have a question:
Should the "Safety and Efficiency" section have a flag on it denoting a potential lack of neutrality?
Also, I just noticed that both sources for the current page are material produced by SGC, which explains, somewhat, the rosy tone of the page's description of SGC... Anyway,
Should there be a notice about neutrality? and
Other sources need to be found, even if they say the same thing as the SGC web pages.
EricWesBrown (Talk) 20:55, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gas Monopoly[edit]

This company keeps jacking up rates every year. My bill has doubled in the last 3 years. It’s only choice I have where I live. How are there still utility monopolies in the United States? They made $200 million last year. Gouging poor people doesn’t end well historically. 63.224.156.23 (talk) 05:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]