Talk:SpaceX Super Heavy
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Partial Failure / Success for IFT2[edit]
Should the IFT2 flight be regarded as a partial failure (a catagory used for other rockets) or success, since it deliver the upper stage to stage separation, which is the primary purpose of any first stage? 86.26.101.55 (talk) 18:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- No, as the booster (Boostback/landing isn't required for a successful flight, according to precedent established by Falcon 9) had a 100% successful flight.
- The failure in the infobox is for IFT-1 Redacted II (talk) 17:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Technical Issue[edit]
If you look at the page statistics page, it lists a bug on the link for Chines (uses external link instead of Wikilink). However, I looked at the source code, and it uses a wikilink.
Anyone know why it's listing that as a bug? Redacted II (talk) 12:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
SubHeading 3[edit]
Adding a SubHeading 3 for every single booster decreases the quality of the article, given that some boosters have only 1-2 sentences dedicated to them. Redacted II (talk) 16:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- @97.117.109.239 warning has been sent to stop edit warring. Continuing to add Sub Heading 3 will result in a report here.
- I have found 0 articles that use Sub Heading 3. There is no reason to add one for every vehicle Redacted II (talk) 01:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class spaceflight articles
- Mid-importance spaceflight articles
- WikiProject Spaceflight articles
- C-Class Rocketry articles
- Unknown-importance Rocketry articles
- WikiProject Rocketry articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject United States articles