Talk:St Peter ad Vincula, South Newington

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suggestions for article layout[edit]

References [1][2] and [5] - I suggest that these be changed from this form

<ref>Sherwood & Pevsner, 1974, pages 771–773</ref>

to this form

<ref>{{harvnb|Sherwood|Pevsner|1974|pp=771–773}}</ref>

and also that |ref=harv be added to the relevant {{cite book}}. This will make the "Reference" link to the "Source".

Section "Bibliography" is a bit of a misnomer. See WP:FOOTERS, sub-heading "Works or Publications or Bibliography" - Bibliography is for lists of works by the article's subject. Lists of works used as reference should be headed "References"; and those not used as direct reference should be "Further reading". When I added Walker, I put it as "Further reading", because I did not draw any facts from it, so I followed the guide at WP:FURTHER. --Redrose64 (talk) 00:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

15 in England?[edit]

Are you sure? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Peter_ad_Vincula#England has 25, including one which is a Chapel and York Minster which is no longer called that.

I suggest making this 23. Or 25. Whichever makes sense. And linking to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Peter_ad_Vincula#England --Robert EA Harvey (talk) 17:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]