Talk:Stan Goff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Where is the criticism?[edit]

What question is there on neutrality here? Yes, the article could use some rewriting and editing, but I don't see anything here about the piece not following NPOV. If anyone has criticisms of the article, please let everyone else know what they are.--Pinko1977 08:49, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. I changed it from NPOV to clean-up. 75.17.199.141 19:37, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Birthday?[edit]

We should get a birthday on this article. I'm thinking Novermberish?

autobio[edit]

I tracert'd the IP that gave the bulk of this article, and it leads to his hometown. I have no problem with this, since Goff's biography is a little elusive in the first place. Neither am I accusing him of writing it with much of a bias (if he wrote it at all). But this is a very messy article, and I'm hesitant to hyper-edit willy-nilly on someone's bio. He deserves a more clean and concise entry.

Just want to let you all know (and I apologize for being a bit underhanded with the tracert, but I had a hunch. It wasn't my intention.)

It's been sufficiently wiki-ized that this shouldn't be a problem anymore. Nitcomb 10:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clean Up[edit]

I am cleaning up this article. Bmedley Sutler 07:54, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Sources[edit]

I'm new to wikipedia and not sure how to add sources. But here is a link to the article he wrote for counterpunch: http://www.counterpunch.org/goff11142003.html

I would argue that Stan Goff and his writings are very significant to veterans in the anti-war movement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefox226G (talkcontribs) 22:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where in the article do you think it should go? Bonewah (talk) 23:11, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]