Talk:Station Group Banak

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleStation Group Banak has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 14, 2013Good article nomineeListed

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Station Group Banak/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 21:53, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Some things that are italicized don't need to be ("Luftwaffe", "Wehrmacht" are both common enough in English), but others aren't and need to be (Operation Nordlicht).
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    "to deploy two battalions consisting of 10,000 men" - this may be different in Norway, but battalions are fairly small units (around a thousand or fewer men). Should this be two brigades?
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just a few small nitpicks, otherwise this article looks ready to go. Good job. Parsecboy (talk) 21:53, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    I have tended to your comments, and done some other minor copyedits as well. You were right about the battalion/brigade issue, luckily the source was found online. Geschichte (talk) 14:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Passed per above. Wizardman 00:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for taking care of it, Wizardman. Parsecboy (talk) 12:52, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you all three for looking after the article. I am sorry I have not had the health to stop by Wikipedia at late. I will remember the italicization rules to next time :) Arsenikk (talk) 21:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Station Group Banak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Station_Group_Banak&oldid=1206503133"