Talk:Stephen Mandel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

These pages on local politicians are uninteresting, Mayor Mandel's being a pertinent example. We should probably have a section on current issues to spice them up. The problem, of course, is potential bias, so careful wording would have to be used. In Mandel's case, there are a few issues that could obviously be included to make the entry more stimulating:

(1) Oversight of Edmonton's recent infrastructure deterioration. (2) Response to the 2006 Windrow Scandal. (3) The ongoing issue (relates to (1)) of roadway deterioration ("City of Potholes"). (4) The above in the context of the proposed new art gallery ($90m), alderperson/mayoral pay increases, car allowances, and, of course, the proposed new hockey arena (>$500m).

All of the above can be reliably sourced (Edmonton Journal, for example, Edmonton City Website etc.). Of course, there would be issues that would reflect positively (I'm too blue collar, so can't think of any myself, others could contribute these).

Thoughts, anyone? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bloom Thorn (talk • contribs) 15:24, March 28, 2007

I think wording like 'scandal' is blowing these issue way out of proportion. Predictably, every spring roads deteriorate due to potholes. The above comments sound more like a political rant, and such bias violates Wikipedia NPOV policies, in particular for biographies of living persons --Leendert 20:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edmonton's Goofy Mayor. I think that our collective patience has been tested to breaking point on the issue of Edmonton's illustrious mayor. I am a resident of Alberta, but not of Edmonton, and, in this context, I am absolutely amazed that this fellow has been allowed to remain as mayor. In the last two months I have heard from friends in the city of a whole litany of goofy behaviour, including the following. (1) Continued indiference to ongoing inrastructure issues, including condoning personal insults directed at many, including seniors such as myself, who dare to criticise him. (2) The ongoing Art Gallery (or should I say Fart Gallery) and Hockey Arena issues. (3) His support for the distribution of free yoyos, light bulbs, gardening trowels, and Heaven only knows what else. (4) His misappropriation of city resources to fund his slum landlord business. The man is either obviously a complete idiot or a dangerous sociopath. Petty and mean-spirited criticism is innappropriate, but everything I hear about this idiot seems to be true.

Finally, who is going to pay for the new tire I had to buy as a result of the pathologically dangerous road maintenance in Edmonton? Or is the damage my fault becuase I do not appreciate Edmonton's goofy idiot mayor?

Kristen Shaw 02:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Call 780-496-5130 and they will compensate you for the damage to your vehicle from an Edmonton pothole. Of course, it sounds a little like you are too busy ranting to bother. Try keeping your personal bias out of an article that is meant to be objective and neutral. Tyrth 14:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The suggestion that the city actually pays compensation for pothole-induced damage is preposterous. The risk management department is absolute in its refusal to pay damages resulting from a simple applications. All paid claims have been lawyer-supported! So in response to the above comments, it is probably much better to spend the $100 on a new tire than to get $100 compensation after spending >$2500 paying a lawyer to threaten the city.

Broken Axle 17:44, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crime Capital of the Prairies[edit]

In all seriousness, the biggest issue in Emdonton is the administration's indifference to crime. I remember a few months ago that the individual referred to as the "idiot mayor" participated in the most disgraceful campaign of ineffective TV and radio advertisements that had no effect on crime rates at all, particularly violent crime. The desperation to be seen doing "something" but to do nothing, for fear of alienating business interests (bars on Whyte) is shameful to say the least.

So in closing, what is the point of maintaining the infrastructure if the city's elected representatives don't care if we live or die? Control crime first, then deal with the roads! Or, in October, deal with the idiot mayor first, then crime, then the roads. Sorry, the term "idiot mayor" just cracks me up!

Elk Islander 03:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-Although Elk Islander is right, Mandel was Mayor during a crime spree, not his fault but neverless he's at the helm. This has to be mentioned. However Wikipedia rules indicate that we need to be neutreal. so we can't call him an 'idiot' mayor. For instance Mandel's government reduced violent crime, and upgraded the police force. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsamcat (talk • contribs) 12:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Neoconservative" approach to governance[edit]

I've deleted the paragraph added by User:Kristen Shaw, as it was blatantly POV and entirely unsourced. If anybody wants to add something comparable, let's discuss it and reach some kind of consensus on it here, first. (the preceding comment was added by User:Sarcasticidealist on 6 July 2007. Unfortunately, he forgot to sign it.)

How else could you possibly describe Mandel's approach? The man positively exudes neoconservatism and his actions make perfect sense in this context. Bloom Thorn 02:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying whether he is a neoconservative ideologue or he isn't (though I've certainly got some neoconservative friends who would take serious issue at the suggestion that Mandel - who they view as a tax and spend mayor - is one of them). My issue was with a totally unsourced and POV paragraph. Sarcasticidealist 03:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The alternative view that Mandel is a "tax and spend" mayor is not incompatible with his neoconservatism. The point is that his policy of diminishing the impact of the public sector defines him as a neocon. After all, look at the great neocon idealogue to the south. There is a lot of tax-funded expenditure in the USA, just not on the traditional public sector areas so favoured by Eurosocialists. Kristen Shaw 13:47, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I would say that you can't simultaneously increase public sector spending as dramatically as Bush has and also be about "diminishing the impact of the public sector". Regardless, anything along the lines of whether or not Mandel is a neocon needs to be sourced and NPOV. I'm certainly open to including a sourced and NPOV paragraph that makes some of these points, if you still want to put one in - but let's hash it out here first. Sarcasticidealist 18:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have been critical of Mandel on this and other pages. However, it has to be said that Shaw and Thorn have a point! Maybe there is logic to the apparent goofiness after all. In the context of Mandel's neoconservatism, his actions make perfect sense. I would argue that his neoconservatism is self evident: it is the only logical explanation of his behaviour that excludes complete and utter insanity. I am now off to buy a suitably patriotic SUV (we are at war, you know), and next week the chasms, potholes, and poor signage will be a distant and hopefully forgotten nightmare. Elk Islander 02:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the paragraph again. Normally, if there is a paragraph that I disagree with added to an article, I leave it there pending consensus being hashed out on the talk page. This helps prevent revert wars. However, in this case I really think that WP:BLP dictates that the paragraph be removed while consensus is hashed out.
In any event, here are my objections to the source:
  • It's a message board posting, which certainly doesn't meet the threshold of "reliable source" under WP:N (I use a posting from the same message board elsewhere in the article; however, the posting that I use is an exact reproduction of an Edmonton Journal article).
  • It doesn't actually make any of the points touched on in the paragraph, except very tangentially (by talking about an alleged intent by Mandel to, in the future, move to funding things by user fees rather than property taxes.
  • Mandel is only tangentially mentioned (he isn't mentioned at all in the thread's initial posting, which I think is telling).
We really need to hash out any neoconservative paragraph here before we put it in. I'm on Wikipedia daily, so hopefully we can get this done quickly. I just think that if Mandel is so clearly "neoconservative", as is being alleged here, at some point some journalist in Edmonton would have mentioned as much (and maybe one has - but if so, let's cite it). Sarcasticidealist 14:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I would hope it would go without saying that any paragraph that we do wind up adding can't include "...each has already contributed significantly to Edmonton's economy" absent an academic study or something to that effect. That's really very POV language. Sarcasticidealist 15:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the same Stephen Mandel[edit]

I assure you that the Stephen Mandel who runs a very successful hedge fund company out of Connecticut is not also a mayor in Canada. Someone please change this.

Pittmang76 12:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC)Garrett Pittman[reply]

Material added by User:Cnmcomm[edit]

I think this material is a clear violation of WP:NPOV, and I've removed it. Please feel free to disagree with me here, so that we can achieve consensus. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 04:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Legally-enshrined protections of freedom and expression"?[edit]

Alright, I really take issue with this statement:

In September 2007, Mandel, in violation of legally-enshrined protections of freedom of expression, ordered the removal from city property of work by Edmonton sculptor Ryan McCourt, after receiving a 700-name petition that alleged McCourt's sculptures had "hurt Hindu religious sensibilities".[6][7]

Although this is a super-long sentence (and ideally should be fixed), I'm really concerned with the "Legally-enshrined protections of freedom and expression" bit. Which specific protections are we talking about? Which Act is this in reference to (the Charter for example)? Has this been pronounced by any credible body? Who? --174.92.149.225 (talk) 23:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you, and have removed the offending section. For future reference, when you see this kind of unsupported ax-grinding statement, you can feel free to remove it yourself. Steve Smith (talk) 04:54, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mayoralty?[edit]

Should this section be added, as in other articles on wiki about the deeds (political decisions, and things a mayor has done in his or her mandate). The controversies go in other sections (ie: Ralph Kline's alcholism is seperate from policies enacted, and his oficial acts and duties of being a primier). I'm no an Edmontonian, so this would be appropriated section for me to update.

Just a suggestion because to make a uniformed approach to data gathering across Wiki.

-Sammycat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsamcat (talk • contribs) 06:14, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

broken links[edit]

Apologizes when I was shifting the data around to try and fit them in the headings, I screwed around with the links.. (Some of them are broken... I will be remedying this problem soon. Please don't delete them. I'm trying to retain the work of other editors as much of the heart of their research is in there still. (I often just detailed and elaborated on some of their posts). ~~sammycat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsamcat (talk • contribs) 13:40, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Stephen Mandel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:34, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Stephen Mandel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stephen Mandel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Stephen Mandel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:10, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Stephen Mandel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stephen_Mandel&oldid=1208760193"