Talk:Steve Rocco (politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeSteve Rocco (politician) was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 15, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed

rocco is andy kaufman?[edit]

well theres theory that he actually is andy kaufman. i think he's strange person - not doubt about it. We doesnt know much about him, he acts like he's in one of Andy sketches ;) Of course he maybe just crazy - but it is worth mentioning about this theory:) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.27.13.201 (talk) 21:31, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Steve Rocco (politician)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The article does not meet the GA criteria at this time. While it does appears to be sufficiently well-cited, there are issues with completeness, as well as the overall organization. It doesn't read like a biographical wikipedia article on an individual, but more like a collection of random notes on this guy. It needs better section headers to tie the information together better. There should also be an infobox in the upper right corner as well. A photo would also help (while I understand the man doesn't like to be photographed, a GIS for 'Steve Rocco' does reveal a file photo; is this public domain? can we use it?).

The prose could use an overhaul. It's a bit choppy in places. Please copyedit.

It might help to review WP:MOSBIO for more guidelines on how to write and organize a biographical article.

Not sure if I'd pass this on the WP:NPOV criterion. The overall theme of the article seems pretty negative. While the guy does appear to be somewhat of a social outcast, the overall tone of the article should be more neutral.

I don't really see any edit-warring or stability issues, so it does pass that criterion.

There are no images in the article to judge the image criterion against. While images are not explicitly required for GA, I still think that, if you could find appropriate permission to use the aforementioned file photo, it would contribute to the article.

Hope that gives you some pointers on how to improve the article. Cheers! Dr. Cash (talk) 17:43, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Steve Rocco (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:00, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]