Talk:Steven Soderbergh/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Headings added

I added a few additional sub-headings and minor edits to this well-written article. Yours, Famspear 20:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Reads like an ad

See headline. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.156.137 (talk) 01:10, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Atheist or not?

Mr. Soderbergh was listed under the category of American atheists but has since been removed. I can't find the history that mentions that particular deletion. Was it due to lack of proof or some other reason?

Gimmickless (talk) 19:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

He is Jewish. You can't just "give up" your Jewish heritage! I am going to amend the Article so it says Jewish-American because it is currently too anti-semitic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.159.111.98 (talk) 07:21, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Actually, he isn't Jewish. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 02:21, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Also, having a Jewish heritage and being an Atheist are not mutually exclusive concepts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billsparks (talk • contribs) 04:04, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Soderbergh might sound jewish, but just like other surnames that end in -man in -berg and -bergh, they are common in certain European countries without implying jewish heritage- Soderbergh is a very common surname in Sweden and not jewish at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.141.136.214 (talk) 01:13, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Titled vs. Entitled

Changed the phrase "Soderbergh directed a play entitled Tot-Mom" to "Soderbergh directed a play titled Tot-Mom" because the word "entitled" was being used incorrectly.

Cartoon

Just wondering why there is a drawing rather than a photo of the subject — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.183.33.133 (talk) 10:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Aesthetics

Rhyming slang? Really? Come on guys, this is making the section look like a thrid year English Major's B- paper. There's rhyming slang in those movies because the characters are Londoners who habitually use rhyming slang, ergo, it's REALISM, not thematic material per se. And there are only Londoners in The Limey because it is a fascinating deconstruction/reconstruction of an older film, Poor Cow, starring the same actor at different times of his life. Arguably, the creation of the Londoner character in the Oceans films is an outgrowth of the earlier project, that is, there is no thematic linkage to speak of. This should be, at least reconsidered, and probably deleted, as it is speculative criticism and clearly violates Wiki guidelines, i.e., it is independent research.Theonemacduff (talk) 06:30, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

The whole aesthetics section should be deleted, it's got nothing to do with aesthetics Verlaine76 (talk) 12:15, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Agreed. It looks pretty much like original research, in spite of a few citations (the citations typically have nothing to do with the main focus of the section). I will delete next week unless anyone strenuously objects. I note too, that there are "aesthetic" bits scattered throughout the article, presumeably to protect them from deletes, that is to say, they appear to be simply stuck into sections to which their connection is tenuous at best. I will attempt a cleanup of those too. Theonemacduff (talk) 03:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

"(...) smaller, less conventional works (...)"

What do you mean by "smaller, less conventional works"? Why list them apart? You mean they took less money and got less revenues? Art pieces are not only remembered because of "consumerism variables", so I do not think it is a good or fair criterion for an encyclopedia, which by definition represents a rather comprehensive, more "neutral" approach. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quinceps (talk • contribs) 02:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Steven Soderbergh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Steven Soderbergh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Archive 1
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Steven_Soderbergh/Archive_1&oldid=836312370"