Talk:Storytelling/Archives/2017

Coca cola ref

The ref cited does not say anything about the article subject, "storytelling" and does not support the statement it attached to. Staszek Lem (talk) 02:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Its one of the merging classics of trans media work, Avatar and others would also be cases. The references supports that. There could be an argument to expand a little on what trans-media means to make the links clearer. Your revert also got rid of other perfectly valid material.----Snowded ^TALK 08:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

This article is not about transmedia. It is about storytelling. The source cited does not speak neither about transmedia nor about storytelling. It does not even use this word. Therefore this piece is original research inadmissible in wikipedia.

edit summary says: "Guardian is not a poor source, and the Coke story is one of the first real cases of trans media, you also removed other sound material - take to talk)"

About Guardian, see above. I don't question it is a good source. I am saying it does not support major statement of the contested text. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

About "sound material" - it is unreferenced and contains dubious interpretations. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Well rather than what appears to be flyby tagging why not check sources and improve the text? On tattooing for example the narrative aspect is well know a brief internet search would find material. I did two while I had time this morning, maybe help out on the rest? ----Snowded ^TALK 05:42, 22 March 2017 (UTC)