Talk:Strategic Air Command/Archive 1

Archive 1

Too long!

This page has just become way too long! I don't personally think that a vast list of every division is suited to Wikipedia at all, and the page is now over 300KB. Please can we put such vast lists in Wikisource, or at least on a different page to this main one? -- Mithent 01:05, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

The above reasons are why I added the cleanup tag. Those long lists need to be aggressively trimmed and summarized or perhaps removed entirely. -- D.M. ^(talk) 04:51, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

I would suggest this page needs to be split into several. Rich Farmbrough. 21:17, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

I split one section into its own article, and even without it, it is still 279KB. Georgia guy 17:43, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

The Bibliography

An article has been created called The Bibliography with content belonging in this article, I've moved the content back into this article and proposed The Bibliography for deletion. --Xyzzyplugh 02:09, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

The bibliography is the actual source of the information that has been added to the Strategic Air Command article and is the source that can be used to validate the information. This is a vast subject covering 46 years and needs a source of validateds.Ron Mixer 19:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, it is of course fine having it in this article, it just doesn't belong in a seperate article. Source material for an article would always belong in the article. --Xyzzyplugh 14:37, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Organisational chart from 1947

The article 1947 Organizational Chart contains an image of an organisation chart for SAC from 1947. That article is currently being considered for deletion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1947 Organizational Chart). I thought I'd draw it to the attention of people looking at this article in case you want to use it here as it currently looks like the page will be deleted (but the images will remain as an orphan). Kcordina 09:32, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Cleanup Organizational Order of Battle ?

I just tagged this article for cleanup - it appears to link back here - does anyone care to take a look at cleaning it up ? Megapixie 00:31, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

I am the origionator of this article. I would appreciate any constructive suggestions on what needs to be cleanws up. R. E. Mixer 22:45, 18 May 2006 (UTC)