Talk:Strawberry Bubblegum/GA2
GA Review[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: EditorE (talk · contribs) 23:34, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Alright, I guess I'll take this one, but I notice a problem. I really don't see the need for a "Background and production", since this basically talks about the development of the entire album (which we can let the 20/20 experience article discuss), and we could let the people who did there jobs and the locations just simply be listed in the personnel section without the need of this being discussed in prose in another section. 和DITOREtails 23:34, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
| Review | ||
| Comment | Date | Checklist |
|---|---|---|
| There needs to be author information for refs 6, 9, |
01:54, 26 August 2013 (UTC) |  Done
|
| What the hell's up with the author info for ref 26? "Sean Daly, Times Pop Music Critic View all Articles" Should "Sean Daily" be the author presented? |
01:54, 26 August 2013 (UTC) | Done
|
| Date for ref 2 needs to be put | 01:54, 26 August 2013 (UTC) | Done
|
| In ref 11, try replacing the "(" ")" with "[" "]" to make it look clearer. |
01:54, 26 August 2013 (UTC) | Done
|
| In ref 27, "Kitty Empire" --> "Empire, Kitty" | 13:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC) | Done
|
| And also, author needed for ref 30. | 13:17, 26 August 2013 (UTC) | Done
|
| I'm still questioning the "Writing and production" section of this article. Again, listing the people involved in making this song in the "Personnel" section is just fine, and "Writing and production" sections are not requirments for a good article. |
17:17, 28 August 2013 (UTC) | |
| Overall, the article looks fine to me and I'll be happy to pass it. | ||