Talk:Strontian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeStrontian was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 15, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed

Anaheilt[edit]

I have proposed Anaheilt be merged into this article. It no longer has its own shop or post office, is generally considered part of Strontian, and is between Strontian and Ariundle on the Polloch road (and Ariundle is on this page). I live in Anaheilt/Strontian. HomebrewToo (talk) 21:58, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

100% agreed. Ben MacDui 08:47, 13 October 2012 (UTC) PS Lucky you![reply]
Agree: seems sensible S a g a C i t y (talk) 09:59, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Until this issue is resolved I don't believe that the current article can be considered stable, and hence its GA nomination is premature. It's also missing a great deal of the information I'd expect to see in a settlement article such as economy, demographics, education, geography, geology, climate and so on, so I'm going to close the GA nomination as "not listed". Doesn't mean it's not a "good" article of course, simply that it fails to meet two of the GA criteria. Once the merger issue is resolved I'll be happy to take another look and undertake to do another GA review, so there needn't be any hanging around waiting for a reviewer, but right now the nomination is certain to fail. Malleus Fatuorum 15:18, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Strontian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Strontian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]