Talk:Summer Ranger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Summer Ranger/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 20:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments[edit]

  • Her first appearance on 23 November 2020 needs a source.
 Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "who she later forms a romantic connection with" → "with who she later forms a romantic connection"
 Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove the comma after "fun and sarcastic".
 Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "on the series" → "in the series"
 Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove the comma after "Warren or Felix".
 Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove the comma after "for her character".
 Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove the comma after "work with Sienna".
 Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove the comma after "arrested for the drugging".
 Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove the comma after "admire Sienna".
 Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
sources
  • References are archived.
  • Main issue here is WP:METRO.
I've not shied away from using Metro sources on soap articles before since the soap department of Metro is separate from the main tabloid site; it has an editorial team and gets all info from the soaps directly since they deal with spoilers and embargoes. Do you think it would be worth bringing this up in a discussion on the RSP? – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Probably. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress[edit]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Summer_Ranger&oldid=1207849078"