Talk:Super Metroid/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Would it not be possible to state, under gameplay, what type of game it is, i.e. a platform game, or what the game class is now called? If for some reason the image is not available, it makes it utterly impossible to know (it could easily have been an FPS, or instance, after the discription).

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I will pass the article, and trust you to address my one concern posthumously. Hopefully this will save us both time and effort. Thanks you for yet another quality article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:42, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

I have marked the game as action-platform and used a reference. Gary King (talk) 21:53, 21 February 2009 (UTC)