Talk:Supermodel (Måneskin song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: VersaceSpace (talk · contribs) 02:38, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

I'll begin this review in a bit. --VersaceSpace 🌃 02:38, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Lead

• Information about the song's release should go before who wrote it. The date of the song's release should be in one of the first sentences of the article.
• The use of the em (en?) dash does not feel necessary here at all. A comma would probably suffice, otherwise the sentence needs some sort of refactoring.
• "what she does for living" → "what she does for a living"
• "according to some, Max Martin's production was damaging to the band's personality"
• "On 31 May, the music video was published" → "On 31 May, the song's music video was published"
• The music video description is written in an in-universe style, contrary to the MOS. See WP:UNIVERSE.
• "it was intended to pay an homage" → "the video pays homage"

I guess I did what you asked for. Tell me if it is enough. infsai (talkie? UwU) 07:55, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Background and development

• "the band reached global success" → "the band achieved global success"
• "It got them wondering whether" → "This caused them to wonder whether or not"
• "leading to creation" → "leading to the creation"
• "and the song's producers" → "as well as the song's producers"
• "'Supermodel' was written by the band members" → "'Supermodel' was written by the members of Måneskin"
• "depicts a life" → "depicts the life"
• "The band's frontman admitted in an interview with BBC, that 'Supermodel' is not one of their 'deepest' songs, but it is a 'good fun'" should be omitted or refactored because 1. the grammar is really bad and 2. this is not really "background" or "development"

  I'm not exactly sure where is that bad grammar you're speaking of-I'm not native English speaker, but this sentence sounds ok for me. Of course except of the part following the last comma, but it's not my fault how David said it. :v infsai (talkie? UwU) 07:55, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

• I may have missed some, but this article has serious issues with grammar and needs copyediting.

Done listed things. infsai (talkie? UwU) 07:55, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Music and lyrics

• "starting with" → "that starts with"
• "It was also noted by many"
• "the track has Californian feeling" → "the track has a Californian feeling"
• "liken" → "likened"
• "'Supermodel' lyrics" → "The lyrics of 'Supermodel'"
• "with religious" → "with a religious"
• "which she quit to pursuit more exciting lifestyle" → "which she gave up to pursue a more exciting lifestyle"
• "The song's persona used to know her, but know she has a new friend" what does that even mean
• "the singer warns a listener, that the character" → "the singer warns the listener that the character, and there should be a comma after the quote that comes directly after
• earning money through onlyfans being "the dark side of supermodel life" is original research.

  Nylon says it. Moved the ref to the end of the sentence...

• The last sentence needs copyediting.

Done listed things. infsai (talkie? UwU) 07:55, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Critical reception

• "Sam Moore dubbed the track as 'lively'" → "Sam Moore dubbed the track 'lively'"
• The Jenesaispop review summary is way too long.

Tried to shorten it just a bit. infsai (talkie? UwU) 02:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Release and commercial performance

• The release info should go in the background section. The commercial performance info should go in the critical reception section and that section should be retitled Reception.
• "Måneskin announced release" → "Måneskin announced the release"
• "with a caption" → "with the caption"
• "The band kept on teasing the single on the following days" → "The band continued teasing the single in the following days"
• "one clip featured" → "one clip featuring"
• "with a footage" → "with footage"
• "certified golf"...really?

  Yes, really. I'm sorry that I make typos from time to time, but you don't have to be rude while pointing it out.

• "as well as it was put on circulation of Italian airplay" → "it was also sent to Italian radios"
• "and Mainstream" → "and the Mainstream"
• "number 114 on Billboard Global 200" → "number 114 on the Billboard Global 200"

Done, except first bullet point. I made "Release and commercial performance" section in various articles (i.e. "Therefore I Am"), and since there is not much info about either release or the single's commercial performance I paired them up here, since it fits better, than adding it to the critical reception section. At least in my opinion. infsai (talkie? UwU) 02:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Overall

Infsai, are you a native/good english speaker? if you're not i'm okay with fixing the grammar things myself. i don't wanna judge you on something that might be harder for you to fix. Regards --VersaceSpace 🌃 15:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

No, I'm not native English speaker, like I said above. Just point me out politely where I messed up the grammar and I'll try to fix it. infsai (talkie? UwU) 02:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Okay, I went ahead and fixed all the grammar stuff. I'll complete the review tonight or tomorrow. --VersaceSpace 🌃 15:28, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Okay, aside from the (now fixed) grammar issues, this article is very well written. Please understand that I was not trying to be rude when pointing out your typos/grammar issues, it's just that issues like these are quite urgent and should not be present in the mainspace of WP, especially on articles like these which can get hundreds of views per day. That being said, the article now appears to meet the Good article criteria! Congrats, I'm going to ✓ Pass this! --VersaceSpace 🌃 02:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. Didn't expect it to happen so quickly though. infsai (talkie? UwU) 02:49, 1 July 2022 (UTC)