This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
Sweet is not just any company, they have taken a whole new approach to queer travel. As such, they have been mentioned in numerous, legitimate publications. I have listed several as external links to the article, but I can add many more. (It's late, so I'd prefer not to list all of them now.) They are a leading company in the lesbian community, highly regarded, and well respected for their altruistic intentions. Further, I made sure to write the article objectively by making sure that every sentence of the article was referenced from some other published article. In fact, none of the writing is my own. Rather, its a compilation from other sources, all of which are properly referenced and, thus not infringing on copyrights, as required by Wikipedia.
The references provided are generally from the company's own website, or mention the company briefly (for instance, to mention a cruise they're sponsoring). Examiner.com refs can be dubious, as the writers are just a hair above a typical blogger and often writing about things they are connected to somehow. Only the Travel + Leisure ref is fully acceptable. The article comes across as too promotional. But I tell you what: I'll pull down the speedy tag for now to allow for some work on it, and will revisit this in a day or two to see if things are better. In the meantime, tone down the promotional language and get some more substantial references. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:43, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah - I'm moving this to "Sweet (company)" per naming conventions. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:49, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
