Talk:Switch (American TV series)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Show opening[edit]

I wonder where in this page would be put in the show's opening title segment, with different-colored vertical lines moving in all directions, being a possible inspiration for the memorable opening titles of New York television station WOR-TV's (now WWOR-TV) "The 4 O'Clock Movie" as used from c.1978 to 1982; the only difference being that WOR's movie show used as its theme a British stock-music piece, Neil Richardson's "The Riviera Affair" (c.1970), which has since been released commercially on at least two CD's; as well as clips from various films in channel 9's movie library at the time being shown instead of segments of various episodes as was the case with "Switch." –Wbwn 00:10, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 July 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure). Jack Frost (talk) 05:20, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Switch (TV series)Switch (American TV series) – Necessary disambiguation from Switch (British TV series), as per WP:INCDAB. Only sending this through a RM because it's been at this title so long. --IJBall (contribstalk) 02:56, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doing one because of WP:TITLECHANGES, and also because of the recent RfC on allowing more "primary subtopics" – an RM is better to gauge consensus on whether this is a "primary subtopic" or not. --IJBall (contribstalk) 15:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support Switch (South Korean TV series) gets 6,215 views compared to only 1,551[[1]] for the American one and 228 for the British one. Even ignoring the South Korean TV series the ratios for the other 2 probably wouldn't be enough to have a PDAB which per the RFC have a higher threshold. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agree that there's likely no "primary subtopic" here, esp. when you look over one year of page views: [2] --IJBall (contribstalk) 18:50, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.