Talk:Syzygium luehmannii

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Syzygium luehmannii is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Common Name discussion I've noted that "Riberry" has been removed as the common name in the article and only applied to the berry. While it may seem that that Riberry only applies to the fruit, in actual fact it is the primary common name given the tree itself. For reference: Flora of New South Wales, Vol. 2, Ed. G. Harden, 1993, p. 144, where "Riberry" is the stated (and only common name) for the species. Also refer to 'Trees and Shrubs in Rainforests of NSW and Southern QLD', Williams et al, and 'Rainforest Trees of Mainland South-eastern Australia', Floyd. If you have any substantial references that contradict this please let me know. However, I'm changing the common name back to riberry as it applies to the species in these standard authoritive texts. John Moss.

Link to bush tucker page[edit]

I note that this tree is mentioned as having fruit that's edible and is a gourmet bushfood: "The berry has a tart, cranberry-like flavour, with a hint of cloves. It has been popular as a gourmet bushfood since the early 1980s and is commercially cultivated on a small-scale basis."

May I suggest adding a link to "bush tucker" here under "See also."

I don't know how to add the links.

Tzali (talk) 14:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]