Talk:Taken by Storm

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 November 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Books

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

Idiocy Rules[edit]

"Global warming ceased to be a subject of scientific debate years ago. Watch how critics jump straight to an examination of motives or credentials rather than the substance of an author’s argument whenever books like this one are published."

This is ridiculous on its face. There's been a consensus among scientists for two decades. Questing global warming is like questioning the holocaust or the existence of the moon. While the author seems to wish people would repeat the vast knowledge that has been built up on the subject every time somebody questions an established fact out of ignorance. Should we cast doubt on the universal theory of gravitation because "it has ceased to be a subject of scientific debate years ago?"

Asinine spam like this is exposing Wikipedia to ridicule:

Wikipedia is Run by George Bush Now?

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.22.219.128 (talk) 18:32, 6 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]