Talk:Tang Jinhua

Tang Jinhua was nominated as a Sports and recreation good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 13, 2018). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women's sport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Badminton Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Badminton, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Badminton on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BadmintonWikipedia:WikiProject BadmintonTemplate:WikiProject Badmintonbadminton articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tang Jinhua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170410051033/http://www.badmintonlink.com/Read-News/China_s_Xia_Huan_and_Tang_Jinhua_clinch_their_first_Super_Series_title to http://www.badmintonlink.com/Read-News/China_s_Xia_Huan_and_Tang_Jinhua_clinch_their_first_Super_Series_title

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tang Jinhua/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 18:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give this a review shortly. Wizardman 18:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here's what I found:

The lead should be expanded.
Any personal life information out there?
The icons for the table colors I'd move to the top of the table rather than the bottom.
"doubles player who competes at the highest level for some years now." Confusing as written; what is the badminton highest level, and the for some years part seems unnecessary.
"She won the women's and mixed doubles categories with different partners, Tang graduate from Hunan University." Should be a period, not a comma. Also should be graduated.
"In 2009, she conquered the World Junior girls' doubles title" Just say won, conquered is definitely unecessary.
The paragraphs all start with "In [year]," which gets repetitive quickly.
"In 2012 Tang Jinhua and Xia Huan were victorious winners" repetitive, just say victorious or winners.
"At the end of 2013 Tang Jinhua surprisingly lost the final" rm surprisingly (technically false anyway as the source doesn't say that)
"and this would become an instant success winning" More superfluous wording added in that is not needed. There's a couple other spots that I noticed similar issues as well.
"In 2015, " this one has a comma but the rest don't; keep consistent.
As a whole, the prose is just that she won this tournament or lost that tournament, with virtually no context or anything else added to the article.

Long story short, this needs a lot of work to be a good article. Some extra expansion is needed to avoid too much repetition, and it needs a rewrite rather than just a simple copyedit from another user. On the plus side the references all appear reliable and placed properly as far as I can see, and the images and tables are all good. As a result I have to fail the article at this time due to the major issues with the prose, as it needs too much work for me to be comfortable putting it on hold. Wizardman 20:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]