Talk:Tarzan (2013 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Animation: European / Films / Computer Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the European animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group.

Untitled[edit]

It premiered in Germany and it's in theatres in Germany now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.122.182 (talk) 22:40, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tarzan (2013 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131014174314/http://www.traileroase.com/tarzan-3d/ to http://www.traileroase.com/tarzan-3d/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-avian dinosaurs[edit]

My clarifying edit correcting the inaccurate mention of the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event causing the extinction of the dinosaurs, which added the encyclopedic descriptor "non-avian", is taken from the linked article itself. The edit was reverted as "adding nothing". What it adds is that instead of giving readers the inaccurate information that the event caused the extinction of the dinosaurs, it implies the accurate data that some dinosaurs survived. A little birdy told me so. Randy Kryn (talk) 20:00, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The edit summary I left was "Pedantic, adds nothing to understanding" and I stand by that. Common culture and normal understanding is reflected in the idiomatic phrase "extinction of the dinosaurs". Anything beyond that is well-outside what is needed for this article and really is a pedantic detail. It is not the purpose in a setup statement for the plot to add details that are basically irrelevant to the setup. Anyone interested can read the linked article, few will or even care as it really doesn't matter much to this story, the point of which it is the search for the meteor that caused it. If really wanted to be precise and lead to even lower levels of reader understanding just say "Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event" and forget the piped common English version of the phrase. What is there now serves the interest of this article best. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:04, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can see your good faith point, that "Common culture and normal understanding is reflected in the idiomatic phrase 'extinction of the dinosaurs'". But even if it's wrong? This is an encyclopedia, and maybe Wikipedia should get it right even if common culture and "normal" (?) understanding would prevail in a film review or a book report. Please add 'non-avian' to the descriptor, as encyclopedic language. "The dinosaurs" did not become extinct, even if some people still incorrectly think they did. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:49, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Let those who care click the link, I removed the link display text and just left the link to the article. See if that sticks with other editors. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:06, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Didn't have to remove the dinosaur descriptor though, just add "non-avian" to it. This is not just one editor's opinion, it's Wikipedia site-wide consistency. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]