Talk:Tata Pixel

Wow, so many problems with this...

How do we add one of those "needs serious clean up" boxes to the top of it again? It looks like someone's basically copy-and-pasted the Nano page and changed a few small details - and inconsistently. I'd like to do it myself, but unfortunately I don't have access to the original source info.

So, anyway... is it a 35hp car, or a 66?

Are you *sure* that it makes its peak power at 5250rpm? It'd be about the highest revving diesel engine in the entire world if it did. Some other production models have their peak closer to what's stated as the upper bound of the torque plateau, here...

Is it a 4-speed (with the ever-so-vague "overdrive in 4th" - does that simply mean an e.g. 1:0.891 4th gear, like in my old VW (a fairly meaningless statement given that you could be comparing a car with that primary gear and a 4.267 differential vs one with a 1:1 or 1:1.1 top primary gear but a 3.75 or 3.43 diff?), or that an actual overdrive-capable differential is installed and it effectively has 5 or more gears? or even that it reaches top speed in 3rd, and 4th is a cruising gear that can only reach 55-60mph?), or does it have infinitely variable transmission that, for reasons not so well explained, makes it very easy to park? Or is one added on top of the other, which seems a bit inefficient?

Arrrgh.

Never mind that in much of these articles the talk is of it being less efficient than the original Nano. Really? A 1200cc diesel engine with an IVT and sub-90g per km emissions (beaten only by the 900cc Smart Diesel, at the moment) being less efficient than something pushed along by a probably motorcycle derived (or maybe just taken from the old 1970s/80s Fiat 126?) 600cc petrol with a 4-speed? I think the jury's going to be out on that one. I'm thinking more along the lines of 80+ mpg (imp) vs the original's 50-60ish.

I bet all the supplier info, weight, dimensions, etc is probably wrong as well. 77.102.101.220 (talk) 20:03, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tata Pixel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120816102053/http://www.torotrak.com:80/pdfs/rns/2011/Tata-Pixel_final_01.03.11.pdf to http://www.torotrak.com/pdfs/rns/2011/Tata-Pixel_final_01.03.11.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)