Talk:Tata Sumo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 20:02, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I don't think this article is neutral, as evidenced by the use of "excellent." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.62.177.61 (talk) 05:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've cleaned up the article with at least a significant amount less of a slant to it - if others have more real information on the vehicle, that might be helpful too!

-- Jkstark (talk) 05:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Design????[edit]

The article says that the Tata Sumo is one of the first in India designed passenger vehicles. The problem is that the design is from another manufacturer named Mekong Auto Corporation which assembled this Design from 1992 to 1997 with their Mekong Stars-4WD. So the Tata Sumo is a license built vehicle or it is a illegal plagiarism. --91.89.156.99 (talk) 16:14, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tata Sumo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]