This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
City Vision University was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 15 June 2019 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into TechMission. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Alsears (talk·contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (Disclosure made below - diff)
I am the Executive Director of TechMission and the President of City Vision University. As mentioned in the deletion discussion, TechMission is now primarily going by the DBA City Vision University, so it would seem to make more sense to merge TechMission into City Vision University.Alsears (talk) 21:45, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
But if more of the coverage is on its days under TechMission, than that is where it should stay for now, just like we keep Shirley Temple and Cat Stevens under their names of primary fame. --Nat Gertler (talk) 23:49, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nearly all coverage, in the media or otherwise, is under City Vision, not TechMission, since over 90% of the programs of TechMission are actually City Vision programs. Would it be possible to reconsider this decision? Evan Donovan (talk) 19:40, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The AFD determined that City Vision did not have sufficient independent secondary coverage in reliable sources so if you want to challenge that decision please identify multiple sources that meet that specification of independent, secondary reliable sources, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:32, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Atlantic306, thanks for your reply. I have added additional reliable secondary coverage of TechMission (d/b/a City Vision University) from more recent years. In these articles, the phrase "City Vision University" is used to refer to the organization. I have also updated other parts of the article to reflect the current status of the organization, now that the two pages have been merged. It is also worth noting that TechMission in quotes currently returns 41,600 results on Google, while City Vision University in quotes returns 46,900, showing that City Vision is becoming the name under which the organization is more known. Evan Donovan (talk) 03:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
