Talk:Ten$ion

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

On 4 September 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Tension (Die Antwoord album) to Ten$ion. The result of the discussion was moved.

Title[edit]

It's unlikely that a serious source would include stylisms like $ in a title for this album. WP MOS is generally not to do so either. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:43, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tension (Die Antwoord album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100217032215/http://www.ariacharts.com.au:80/pages/charts_display.asp?chart=1G50 to http://www.ariacharts.com.au/pages/charts_display.asp?chart=1G50

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 September 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tension (Die Antwoord album) → Ten$ion – WP:TMRULES ("When a name is almost never written except in a particular stylized form, use that form on Wikipedia"). Sources consistently write this with stylized s as $. Additionally, this would be WP:NATDIS (albeit of a term that is already the WP:COMMONNAME) and is an easily distinguishable WP:SMALLDETAIL. SilverLocust 💬 16:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

162 etc. has disagreed with this move by Miklogfeather for reasons that are not clear to me. And In ictu oculi disagreed above because the sources in this article are apparently not "serious". SilverLocust 💬 16:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom and WP:SMALLDETAILS. FWIW, I think 162's point was that the move was not uncontroversial, and regardless of their views on the matter, wanted it discussed, which is completely reasonable. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.