Talk:Tenby Schools Penang

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tenby Schools Penang article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

keep, 16 December 2012 (UTC), see discussion.
keep, 8 December 2012 (UTC), see discussion.

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 May 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

Malaysia Low‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Further reading[edit]

I won't remove them while there's an AfD in process, lest it be thought underhand, but the articles currently in "Further reading" look like churned press releases, and are not sufficiently significant to be included in the article long-term, should it not be deleted. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:45, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think you're exagerating to be quite honest, though the New Straits Times artilce looks like it doesn't contain much 'journalism', I agree! However, I do notice that at least one article is not about the Penang school at all, for example this one (Miri). I think it is fair to remove it. Sionk (talk) 18:39, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Press releases are reliable sources. I like to add extra sources that aren't integrated into the text into the further reading section so editors quickly see them and know they can expand the article with them. If you prefer, you can move them to the talk page. I worry that editors might not always check the talk page, especially if it's a stub. But then I spoke to a different editor and he said he wouldn't check the further reading section but would check the talk page, so maybe it's good to duplicate them. --Odie5533 (talk) 21:17, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Press releases are reliable if they're published by the press. Presumably any reliable source will check a press release stands up to scrutiny, before they publish it. Sionk (talk) 21:49, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[reply to both] I didn't comment, here, about the suitability of these articles as reliable sources. They're not suitable to be in a "further reading" section, per WP:EL. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]