Talk:Tensta

Working class suburb?[edit]

This stub seems to be written by an old communist. Suburbs like Tensta are marked with high unemployment. I have no stats available, but I would guess most of the adult people do not work.

Cyrruss 10:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

working class indicates the type of suburb Tensta is. If it would just say suburb, most American readers would think it was a upper middle class area, which is usually what a suburb in the US is like. Bronks

- You can live in you communist dream-cuckoo land, but the fact is most inhabitants of Tensta and similar suburbs do not work. XavierTheGreat 02:13, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- - Working class could well refer to the unemployed. 惑乱分からん 19:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- - - Exactly, Working class has nothing at all to do with whether you are actually employed or not, and besides, 3.7% is hardly "most inhabitants". /Hugoflug 20:24, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

unemployment discussion[edit]

Quote (p. 65):

61 percent of the inhabitants able of working were unemployed in 1995. Later estimations show that this figure has fallen to 50 percent.

Quote (p. 64): It is one of the poorest neighbourhoods in Stockholm with its high rates of unemployed residents (8,7 percent), social welfare dependency (40 percent), immigrants (66 percent), and low education level.

(the NYT says 85% immigrants, btw, which i suppose is a good source for wikipedia.)

I think you misread 8.7 as 3.7. How can a neighborhood constantly characterized as having "high umemployment" have such low rates? I cannot find that number in the study at all. Can you please discuss things before assuming I'm making up material? That's what the talk page is for. Didn't you tell me wikipedia has a good faith policy? Misheu 11:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1999: 8.7%. 2000: 3.7% (p102). Which figure do you think is the most appropriate? I recommend you go to SCB for later figures. Mackan 12:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok Misheu 12:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tensta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:59, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]