Talk:Terna Group/Archive 1

Requested move 23 December 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Although, really, this is actually reverting an undiscussed move. (non-admin closure) Egsan Bacon (talk) 17:04, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

---

Terna Group (Italian company) → Terna Group – There is no need for the specification 'Italian company' in the title as it is not the exact match of the name of the Greece company (GEK Terna and its subsidiaries). The existing hatnote is enough to make a clear distinction. The target page is already redirecting to this page. Beagel (talk) 11:00, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

• Support - There is not another page titled, Terna Group. I don't see why it is necessary to clarify that it is an Italian company in the page name. Meatsgains (talk) 15:29, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Lead section

Hi, I'd like to update the first lines of the introductory section by making them more straightforward .

I would slightly edit them as follows (the parts in red I would replace with those highlighted in yellow):

Terna Group is a transmission system operator (TSO) group of energy companies based in Rome, Italy. It operates through Terna Rete Italia, that manages the Italian transmission grid an Italian electricity transmission system operator, whereas and Terna Plus which is in charge of evaluating new business opportunities and non-traditional activities in Italy and abroad.

Under "External links", I'd also add a link to other TSOs (such as those listed here), in order to give the reader a wider perspective on the sector. Finally, I'd delete the three existing links within the same section, since one is promotional and the other two are broken.

What do you think? Alessandra Bardo (talk) 12:42, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Since I had not yet received any answer, I thought I could proceed, considering that any changes could easily be undone. I tried to be bold making the lead section straightforward. Alessandra Bardo (talk) 12:58, 24 July 2018 (UTC)