Talk:Terry Pratchett/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:37, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Well written , conforms sufficiently with MoS. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:46, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I repaired some reference links using WP:CHECKLINKS. Ref #78 [1] appears to be a dead link. I have commented it out as I cannot find a replacement source. All other references check out. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:33, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   OK, I am more than happy to confirm the status of this as a WP:Good article. I believe this could be taken to WP:FAC. There may be some quibbles about some of the sources, but they are sufficient for GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:33, 7 August 2009 (UTC)