Talk:The Abstinence

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage / Seinfeld

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the Seinfeld task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Gap in the plot summary[edit]

The plot summary seems to be missing something--The sentence "George calculates the odds of having sex with a Portuguese waitress, and concludes that statistically, he has to do it" comes out of nowhere. Is there an actual Portuguese waitress present? Or does George just decide to go find one and sleep with her? The summary seems to indicate that George did in fact have sex with someone, so was it a Portuguese waitress, and if so, where did she come from? (I haven't seen this episode, and I honestly can't tell from the summary what happens.) 71.58.209.95 (talk) 21:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, that sentence is needlessly vague and complicated. I can't believe it remained up for over eight years; I have fixed it now. (I can imagine how the editor who wrote that would have summarized Star Wars: "Luke calculates the odds of firing two photon torpedoes into an exhaust port leading to the Death Star's reactor, and concludes that statistically, he has to do it.")--Martin IIIa (talk) 15:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]