Talk:The Alice B Readers Award

I apologize for being slow to add the references and justification for why the Alice B group should be added. I am continuing to add the data, and next time I will be sure to add Notes and References FIRST! Please don't delete this. It is definitely something that should be in Wikipedia as it involves a couple dozen extremely notable authors. Thanks! Diane Dmthompson (talk) 21:51, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y'know, I'm willing to buy that, personally. It's a bit presumptious on my part to assume none of the authors are notable. I'd just make sure to get up any outside references you can find to this group, personally. It'd also be good to remove first-person terms like "our", so you can alleviate the COI issue. I'll go ahead and blot out the template to give you a bit more time. If it's still got major problems later, I'll put it up for AfD so others can evaluate the situation. But I doubt that'll be necessary. Let me know if you need info or have questions! - Vianello (talk) 21:55, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am hoping that the page now meets Wikipedia standards, Vianello, and any chance of deletion will now be removed. Thanks for your help. Diane Dmthompson (talk) 14:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Style[edit]

Wikipedia has standard styles and formats, Please read WP:MOS especiall on sub headings and lists. --Triwbe (talk) 08:39, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]