Talk:The Apprentice (British TV series) series 10

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 September 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: The Apprentice UK / British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Apprentice UK task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

Results Section, and Notes Section[edit]

I have been reworking the "Result" Section on each series, and for good reason. Every series, the task's "Result" section, did more than give information on who got what in terms of goal (i.e. Team A got X amount of profit, Team B got X profit), but gave a full review of the task and how each team performed. This I felt was something a bit wrong. From now on, could we perhaps try to, please, to do it as this in future:

"Task Review" - Review of the task, and in general, what each team did, notable issues and good/bad points the teams did.
"Result" - The results for each team, revealed in the boardroom (like the example above).

In addition, the "Notes" Section should contain relevant information from the episode, that is most notable and should be kept in. Anything like a major issue encountered in the task, arguments in the boardroom, and comments by Lord Sugar and Advisor, and anything significant that is a first time on the show, can be included, but not too many, and no Records, unless they exceed current ones (Don't include Joint PM victories or "Candidate X has been in the boardroom for the second time" or "Candidate Y is the only one not to be in the boardroom to date", and such; someone included the Joint PM Victory point a lot of the time, but failed to notice they were duplicating a fact that Weekly Results covers).