Talk:The Astounding Wolf-Man

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Astounding Wolf-Man article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comics: United States Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Clean-up[edit]

As a fan from day one of this book I want the Wikipedia entry for this book to really stand out, not as a promotional tool, but as a quality of source of information on the book that doesn't violate Wikipedia's rules and standards. As such, I think there's some major work to be done.

A big problem is the storyline section which I isolated from the last edit of the page. It's a summary and that is not allowed in the format that it's in currently. It also make the page seem fannish. I hesitate to delete it but it needs to be whittled down or removed altogether.

A picture should be added as well (I don't know how to add pictures so I'll learn how to do so soon) and, in the future, we should watch out for editorializing and heavy summarizing as those really cheapen lots of other comics pages.

I know I'm not the only one editing this page so I hope the rest of you will pitch in to make this a quality entry to Wikipedia. Ryuukuro 01:59, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cancelled?[edit]

Has the seris been cancelled, there has been no activity for several months since its 2nd publication? - RVDDP2501 19:51, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. It's a bimonthly. The last issue was released in late September, and there's another issue scheduled to be released in November. Ccm043 14:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the series will be ending with issue #25.--129.188.33.26 (talk) 20:41, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone wanna clear up the story section?[edit]

It's a bit... hanging.

And this needs a character section. Granted, it won't be "big" for now, at least it'd be easier to fill up as the series goes on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.2.126.111 (talk) 06:45, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have created an initial character section, if anybody wants to expand or edit it, have at it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Avogadro522 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is the comic bi-monthly?[edit]

Or is it still having an unstable release date? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.2.113.46 (talk) 17:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's bimonthly. Ccm043 02:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Issue 5 release date trouble[edit]

Some websites say that Wolfman #5 has been released around Jan. 5-8 this year, but when I checked the comic release schedules of Image Comics website, I see no Wolfman (It also makes sense, since the previous release was in December so the next release is most likely February). Are the dates correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.2.114.47 (talk) 16:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]