Talk:The Black Cherry Bombshells

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Comics: Webcomics / DC Comics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Webcomics.
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/01/zito-and-trov-on-the-black-cherry-bombshells-going-analog/

Copyright violation[edit]

The plot was (correctly) flagged as copyright violation [1] so I've removed it as well as formatting the page [2]. Feel free to add your own plot synopsis but copying and pasting from another site would just get this article deleted (quickly) and I'd rather we didn't go down that road. (Emperor (talk) 14:03, 19 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I've had to remove the text again [3] please don't add it again. (Emperor (talk) 19:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]

And again[edit]

I've just had to remove copyvio material again, plus the blatantly promotional edits by one of the comics' creators, Tony Trov, which violates WP:COI ten ways to Tuesday.

I've synthesized and consolidated the information to what I think is the basic, neutral, non-promotional gist of things, and cut down the plethora of promotional links to the handful that Wikipedia guidelines state for "External links."

I will post a notice on Trov's talk page, asking him to please desist. --Tenebrae (talk) 03:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits of January 3[edit]

The people involved with Zuda continually attempt to use Wikipedia as a promotional vehicle, and here, as in The Black Cherry Bombshells and elsewhere, refuse to use the consensus-derived WikiProject Comics formatting, use solicitation-style blurbs rather than neutral-tone synopses, and generally write in a hype-y, non-encyclopedic tone. If this were newbie mistakes, that would be one thing. But they continually revert the work of responsible editors and engage in conflict-of-interest behavior, often through anonymous IPs, that has no place in an encyclopedia.

No one involved in Zuda should be editing Zuda articles. Anyone editing Wikipedia should be versed in the policies and guidelines that are given an overview in the Five Pillars of Wikipedia.

Please refrain from all promotional, non-encyclopedic edits. This is a matter than can warrant administrator intervention, the locking of articles, and blocks or bans of those engaging in what is considered, after these detailed warnings, vandalism. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]