Talk:The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title.[edit]

The official title, as seen on the official website, and the official poster is The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day. Why don't we move the page, and edit as according? Obi-WanKenobi-2005 (talk) 05:12, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Bob Rubin"[edit]

Pretty sure the article links to wrong Bob Rubin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Statalyzer (talkcontribs) 06:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Holy Crap"[edit]

Is there even a shred of evidence suggesting that to be the next film's title? 75.67.47.56 (talk) 21:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WTF?[edit]

Who the hell destroyed the plot section? There was no reason to do that.... and what are the qualifications to be a douche again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timmyfitz161 (talkcontribs) 04:25, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Spoiler"[edit]

At the screenings prior to the general release (I attended the NYC one), Troy Duffy and the cast asked that Smecker's appearance at the end of the film be kept under raps to save the surprise. I'm sure it's probably out there to some extent, but all the interviews and preview articles respected their request. While it may seem like a moot issue to many at this point in time, since the film was initially released months ago, there are still (as I understand it) several areas in the country which have not had a reel of the film (for example, the Rochester, NY area). As such, should the article enclose the mention of him under a spoiler heading? If I were more skilled in Wiki, I would do this myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.15.74 (talk) 06:35, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the general thought on that is if you are reading the plot section of a movie you haven't seen, you are already reading spoilers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.240.89.45 (talk) 14:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia in no way does spolier warnings anymore. Please read WP:SPOILER. (Deftonesderrick 14:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Willem Dafoe[edit]

I'm confused, the article states that he would NOT return for the sequel, yet he actually is in the movie. This might need to be clarified, somehow.99.6.143.133 (talk) 05:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who?[edit]

"the protégée of Paul Smecker (who has died)" Who is he? 104.153.40.58 (talk) 21:48, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]