Talk:The Brus

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medieval Scotland Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medieval Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Medieval Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Medieval ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject Medieval ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject Medieval ScotlandMedieval Scotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[National myth#Scotland|national story]] The anchor (#Scotland) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Move To The Brus[edit]

Shouldn't the title reflect that? Like, shouldn't it be italizaed?96.53.149.117 (talk) 02:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Northern English[edit]

The Bruce: W. M. MACKENZIE, M.A., F.S.A. (Scot.) LONDON ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK 1909

"The language of the Bruce is Northern English, the dialect spoken north of the Humber. Barbour himself calls it “Inglis” (Bk. IV. 253), and Scottish writers down to the sixteenth century do the same. The name “Scots” is therefore a term of pure convenience, signifying the English spoken within the political borders of Scotland, which continued to be an independent literary medium after the Northern English of England had ceased to be such, and had yielded place to the standard dialect of Chaucer and his successors. But the language of the Aberdeen Barbour is substantially that of the Yorkshire Richard Rolle."

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/44292/44292-h/44292-h.htm#Page_511 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.38.110 (talk) 18:54, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lead - reversions[edit]

User:Mutt Lunker - Please justify your reversion, on the grounds of:

 '"this is rambling, poorly-expressed & barely comprehensible - such a level of detail goes in the main body (if not already there); various dubious MOS choices "

and clearley state specifically what you object to. A sentence, without resorting to throwing a selection from the List of fallacies, as to what is wrong with the revised lead, and how your reversion improves the article, let alone address the long outstanding POV, and the lack of sources, would be appreciated. If you wish to be constructive, please suggest an alternative lead, to address the highlighted issues.

 A.j.roberts (talk) 22:20, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd point you to MOS:INTRO: Editors should avoid lengthy paragraphs and overly specific descriptions – greater detail is saved for the body of the article. The lede should not be a detailed list, in one very long sentence, of every aspect of the work. Such details could be laid out in the body of the article, if they are not already there. I have no doubt your intention is of good faith but you demonstrate the same convoluted, fractured sentence construction in your post above that you do in your edit. Sorry if that seems blunt but you do not express yourself well. The existing text is not "(my) version" and if the alternative is yours, the former is distinctly preferable. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]