Talk:The Complete Blue Note Recordings of Thelonious Monk

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Artwork[edit]

It would be nice to find artwork for the Mosaic and Blue Note releases. I'm having trouble finding good copies online, and I don't think I can get a good scan of my CD box set. albumartexchange.com might have some good scans though. TlonicChronic (talk) 20:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the past, I think I've used cover images from AllMusic with an appropriate use rationale. There used to be a way to automatically generate this, but it didn't work last time I tried it. See later revisions of that page for a couple of different rationale statements. Brunton (talk) 15:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! TlonicChronic (talk) 15:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page move[edit]

TlonicChronic, I'm not convinced that this move was appropriate. It means we've lost the page for the sessions themselves, which are more clearly notable than any of the reissues; they get enough of a mention even in a couple of general histories of jazz I've got to establish notability, and biographies of Monk discuss them in detail. If the reissues have sufficient coverage to establish notability they should have their own pages which could be linked from the sessions page, but the sessions themselves definitely should have their own article. Brunton (talk) 15:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the sessions are more notable, but there weren't any citations in the original page, and it simply gave a track list of the six session, plus a discography plus a bunch of track lists for already extant pages. All six sessions, as originally shown in the article, are directly preserved in this track list. TlonicChronic (talk) 15:20, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TlonicChronic, as with your unilateral squashing together of "Genius" volumes 1 and 2, your move of the sessions page to this one simply muddies the water on what was a more informative page about the various releases of this material. If the prior page was lacking citations, why not put out a request for such citations to be added? Your edits are destructive, here, and I don't think there was widespread desire for the material to be reformatted in this way. Sojambi Pinola (talk) 18:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]