This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article desperately needs additional citations for verification and needs references that appear in reliable third-party publications - other than the publisher's homepage. It reads like the book's back-cover summary. Additionally, making outrageous claims like "where it received an unprecedented response from the public" are more appropriate for a press release than a Wikipedia article. What does that even mean? Unprecedented compared to what, Candide? Or some other Chinese student's diary? And what public, Chinatown in Belleville? Or a housewife's reading group? I have left that claim in for the time being to see if the article's original editors feel like verifying it with a source (good luck!). If not, then that claim needs to be deleted. Hopechina (talk) 04:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)Hopechina[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}